In the Matter of Burger

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In the Matter of Burger

987 A.2d 617, 201 N.J. 120

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 16, 2010·No. D-40 September Term 2009, 065198·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-243, concluding that MARTIN BURGER of PALISADES PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1953, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.4(a) (sharing legal fees with nonlawyer employee), and RPC 7.3(d) (compensating or giving anything of value to a person to recommend or secure the lawyer’s employment by a client, or as a reward for having made a recommendation resulting in the lawyer’s employment by a client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARTIN BURGER is hereby reprimanded; and it is farther

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-243, concluding that MARTIN BURGER of PALISADES PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1953, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.4(a) (sharing legal fees with nonlawyer employee), and RPC 7.3(d) (compensating or giving anything of value to a person to recommend or secure the lawyer’s employment by a client, or as a reward for having made a recommendation resulting in the lawyer’s employment by a client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARTIN BURGER is hereby reprimanded; and it is farther

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In the Matter of Burger, 987 A.2d 617, 201 N.J. 120 (N.J. 2010).

Pincite

987 A.2d 617 (In the Matter of Burger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related