In the Matter of: Beulah Agbabiaka

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 27, 2024·No. 101 WM 2024·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE MATTER OF: BEULAH : No. 101 WM 2024 AGBABIAKA MOTION FOR EXTENSION : PURSUANT TO RULE 311 :

:

DISSENTING STATEMENT

JUSTICE WECHT

Attorneys admitted to practice in this Commonwealth under Rule 311 of the

Pennsylvania Bar Admission Rules are authorized to do so for a period of thirty months;

extensions are available only “for good cause shown.” Pa.B.A.R. 311(g). The applicant

here having failed to explain why thirty months’ notice was insufficient, I would decline to

grant an extension of the deadline provided by our Rules.

Justice Mundy joins this dissenting statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of: Beulah Agbabiaka, (Pa. 2024).

In the Matter of: Beulah Agbabiaka (In the Matter of: Beulah Agbabiaka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.