In the Matter of: Beulah Agbabiaka
This text of In the Matter of: Beulah Agbabiaka (In the Matter of: Beulah Agbabiaka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
IN THE MATTER OF: BEULAH : No. 101 WM 2024 AGBABIAKA MOTION FOR EXTENSION : PURSUANT TO RULE 311 : :
DISSENTING STATEMENT
JUSTICE WECHT
Attorneys admitted to practice in this Commonwealth under Rule 311 of the
Pennsylvania Bar Admission Rules are authorized to do so for a period of thirty months;
extensions are available only “for good cause shown.” Pa.B.A.R. 311(g). The applicant
here having failed to explain why thirty months’ notice was insufficient, I would decline to
grant an extension of the deadline provided by our Rules.
Justice Mundy joins this dissenting statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of: Beulah Agbabiaka, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-beulah-agbabiaka-pa-2024.