In the Matter of: Benoit Otis Brookens II
This text of In the Matter of: Benoit Otis Brookens II (In the Matter of: Benoit Otis Brookens II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In the Matter of : No. 2040 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : BENOIT OTIS BROOKENS, II : Board File No. C3-13-26 : : (Superior Court of the District of Columbia, : Case No. 2011 CCC 10, PDID No. : 531998) : : Attorney Registration No. 20284
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
th AND NOW, this 14 day of August, 2014, a Rule having been entered by
this Court on April 24, 2014, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Benoit Otis
Brookens, II, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and,
upon consideration of the responses filed, the request for oral argument is denied and it
is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Benoit Otis Brookens, II, is
placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E.; and he shall
comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of: Benoit Otis Brookens II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-benoit-otis-brookens-ii-pa-2014.