In the Matter of Bedell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In the Matter of Bedell

10 A.3d 227, 204 N.J. 596, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 16

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 20, 2011·No. D-17 September Term 2010, 067030·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-152, concluding that DONALD W. BEDELL, JR., of BRICKTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter), RPC 1.4(c) (failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation), and RPC 8.4(e) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation),

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DONALD W. BEDELL, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-152, concluding that DONALD W. BEDELL, JR., of BRICKTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter), RPC 1.4(c) (failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation), and RPC 8.4(e) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation),

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DONALD W. BEDELL, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In the Matter of Bedell, 10 A.3d 227, 204 N.J. 596, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 16 (N.J. 2011).

Pincite

10 A.3d 227 (In the Matter of Bedell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related