In the Matter of Baldinger

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In the Matter of Baldinger

949 A.2d 205, 195 N.J. 179, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 781

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 11, 2008

DocketD-141 September Term, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 949 A.2d 205 (In the Matter of Baldinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Baldinger, 949 A.2d 205, 195 N.J. 179, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 781 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-810, concluding that BRUCE E. BALDING-ER of BRIDGEWATER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2) (concurrent conflict of interest) and RPC 1.8(a) (engaging in business transaction with client without required safeguards), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRUCE E. BALDINGER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-810, concluding that BRUCE E. BALDING-ER of BRIDGEWATER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2) (concurrent conflict of interest) and RPC 1.8(a) (engaging in business transaction with client without required safeguards), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRUCE E. BALDINGER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

949 A.2d 205, 195 N.J. 179, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-baldinger-nj-2008.