in the Matter of B. D. P.
This text of in the Matter of B. D. P. (in the Matter of B. D. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00369-CV
In the Matter of B. D. P.
FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. D-19-0013-J, THE HONORABLE BRAD GOODWIN, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant is a juvenile, represented by appointed counsel, who seeks to appeal an
order modifying his disposition and committing him to the Institutional Division of the Texas
Juvenile Justice Department. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on August 3, 2021, and his
brief was due on October 15, 2021. On November 9, 2021, this Court sent a notice to appellant
informing him that his brief was overdue and that he should file a motion for extension of time
or a brief accompanied by a motion for extension of time before November 19, 2021. To date,
appellant has not filed a motion for extension of time or brief or otherwise responded to
our notice.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. See
Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(2) (when appellant’s brief is late in civil case, appellate court may
“decline to dismiss the appeal and give further direction to the case as it considers proper”); In re
L.L.M., No. 03-11-00127-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9004, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 9, 2011, no pet.)) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (abating appeal from order adjudicating juvenile
delinquent); In re M.A.D., 167 S.W.3d 938, 939 (Tex. App.—Waco 2005, order) (same). Upon
remand, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant wishes to
prosecute his appeal and, if so, whether counsel has abandoned this appeal See Tex. R. App. P.
38.8(b)(2). The trial court shall make appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id.
If necessary, the trial court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent
appellant in this appeal. See id.; In re M.R., No. 03-02-00190-CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 1748,
at *7 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 27, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Because of the criminal nature of
delinquency adjudications, juveniles are entitled to the same reasonably effective counsel that
they would have as adults in a criminal proceeding.” (citing In re K.J.O., 27 S.W.3d 340, 342
(Tex. App.—Dallas 2000, pet. denied)). Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the
trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all
findings and orders—to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than January 18, 2022.
See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).
It is ordered on December 15, 2021.
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
Abated and Remanded
Filed: December 15, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Matter of B. D. P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-b-d-p-texapp-2021.