In the Matter of Agrait

21 A.3d 1183, 207 N.J. 33, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 705
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJuly 15, 2011
DocketD-111 September Term 2010, 068328
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 A.3d 1183 (In the Matter of Agrait) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Agrait, 21 A.3d 1183, 207 N.J. 33, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 705 (N.J. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-411, concluding that WILLIAM ENRIQUE AGRAIT of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be censured for violating RPC 1.7(a) and (b) (concurrent conflict of interest) and RPC 1.9(a) (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM ENRIQUE AGRAIT is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of D'Arienzo
21 A.3d 1183 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.3d 1183, 207 N.J. 33, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-agrait-nj-2011.