In the Matter of A-Cos Leasing Corporation, Debtor v. Honorable J. Ingraham, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, in the Matter of Sarge-Tex Motors Corporation, Debtor v. Honorable J. Ingraham, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division
This text of 408 F.2d 492 (In the Matter of A-Cos Leasing Corporation, Debtor v. Honorable J. Ingraham, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, in the Matter of Sarge-Tex Motors Corporation, Debtor v. Honorable J. Ingraham, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
408 F.2d 492
In the Matter of A-COS LEASING CORPORATION, Debtor, Petitioner,
v.
Honorable J. INGRAHAM, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Respondent.
In the Matter of SARGE-TEX MOTORS CORPORATION, Debtor, Petitioner,
v.
Honorable J. INGRAHAM, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Respondent.
No. 27256.
No. 27257.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
February 7, 1969.
Alonza O. C. Sargent, Houston, Tex., for petitioner.
R. F. Wheless, Jr., Houston, Tex., for respondent.
Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
ON PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
PER CURIAM:
The petitioners ask this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district judge to vacate his order denying the petitioners relief under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act. The writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and will issue only in limited and unusual circumstances: "(W)hile a function of mandamus in aid of appellate jurisdiction is to remove obstacles to appeal, it may not appropriately be used merely as a substitute for the appeal procedure prescribed by the statute." Roche v. Evaporated Milk Association, 1943, 319 U.S. 21, 26, 63 S.Ct. 938, 941, 87 L.Ed. 1185, 1190. The petitioners here maintain, without citing authority, that an appeal is impossible because no parties opposed the petitions that were dismissed below. The petitioners' premise is incorrect. In the Matter of Colorado Trust Deed Funds, Inc., 10 Cir. 1962, 311 F.2d 288. The petitions for writ of mandamus are accordingly denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 F.2d 492, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-a-cos-leasing-corporation-debtor-v-honorable-j-ca5-1969.