In the Interest of Z.H.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Z.H.

223 S.W.3d 857, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 502, 2007 WL 898617

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2007

DocketED 88278

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 S.W.3d 857 (In the Interest of Z.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of Z.H., 223 S.W.3d 857, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 502, 2007 WL 898617 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

G.D. (Mother) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in which the court found that the Children’s Division was not required to make reasonable efforts to reunify minor children M.H., Z.H., L.H., M.T.H., and D.H. with Mother. Mother contends in her sole point on appeal that the trial court erred in finding the Children’s Division was not required to make reasonable efforts at reunification pursuant to Section 211.183.7 RSMo 2000, on the grounds that: (1) Mother subjected Z.H., L.H., and D.H. to a severe act or recurrent acts of physical and emotional abuse; and (2) Mother committed a felony assault that resulted in a serious bodily injury against a child or to another child of the parent. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

G.D. (Mother) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in which the court found that the Children’s Division was not required to make reasonable efforts to reunify minor children M.H., Z.H., L.H., M.T.H., and D.H. with Mother. Mother contends in her sole point on appeal that the trial court erred in finding the Children’s Division was not required to make reasonable efforts at reunification pursuant to Section 211.183.7 RSMo 2000, on the grounds that: (1) Mother subjected Z.H., L.H., and D.H. to a severe act or recurrent acts of physical and emotional abuse; and (2) Mother committed a felony assault that resulted in a serious bodily injury against a child or to another child of the parent. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 S.W.3d 857, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 502, 2007 WL 898617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-zh-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack