in the Interest of Z.H. and Z.H., Children
This text of in the Interest of Z.H. and Z.H., Children (in the Interest of Z.H. and Z.H., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-21-00096-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF Z.H. AND Z.H., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 307th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-1156-DR
Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and Carter,* JJ.
______________________________________ *Jack Carter, Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment ORDER
Our review of the Appellant’s brief in this matter indicates that it contains the identities
of the minor children at issue in this parental-rights termination case in violation of Rule 9.8 of
the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Rule 9.8(b) states,
(b) Parental-Rights Termination Cases. In an appeal or an original proceeding in an appellate court, arising out of a case in which the termination of parental rights was at issue: (1) except for a docketing statement, in all papers submitted to the court, including all appendix items submitted with a brief, petition, or motion: (A) a minor must be identified only by an alias unless the court orders otherwise . . . .
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b)(1)(A) (second, third, and fourth emphases added); see also TEX. R. APP. P.
9.9. The appellant’s brief contains the real names of the minor children under the Statement of
the Case section of the brief, as well as in the Order of Termination contained in the appendix to
the brief.
To protect the identity of the children, we hereby strike the Appellant’s brief and order
that appellant refile his brief using only aliases for the minor children, in accordance with Rule
9.8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We further order that Appellant’s corrected brief
by refiled on or before January 26, 2022. We note that this is not a license for Appellant to
revise the substance of his brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 19, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of Z.H. and Z.H., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-zh-and-zh-children-texapp-2022.