in the Interest of W.T.H., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 2016·No. 04-16-00055-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 10, 2016

No. 04-16-00055-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF W.T.H., A CHILD,

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-06-00125-CVK Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER By order dated April 20, 2016, appellant was ordered to file his brief by May 20, 2016. Because neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed by the deadline, on May 26, 2016, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing, by June 10, 2016, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

On May 26, 2016, a document was efiled in this court’s electronic portal. The document does not contain an appellate court cause number and is styled as an original proceeding, i.e., “In re Kevin Fischer, Relator.” The document is labeled as “APPELLATE BRIEF” but the footer identifies it as a petition for writ of mandamus. The identity of parties section of the document identifies the parties as relator and real party in interest. The Statement of the Case and Jurisdiction section of the document states, “This case is an appeal of an Order Granting Intervenor’s Plea to the Jurisdiction in cause number 15-06-00125-CVK and an Order on a Bill of Review Issued in cause No. 15-09-00217-CVK.” Our appellate cause number 04-16-00055- CV only pertains to trial court cause number 15-06-00125-CVK.

Because of the confusion created by this document, two of our deputy clerks informally contacted the attorney who filed the document, Ms. Karen Dalglish Seal, for clarification. Ms. Seal did not, however, respond to these inquiries.

It is therefore ORDERED that Ms. Seal file a written explanation in this court no later than June 14, 2016, stating whether the referenced document was intended to be filed as the appellant’s brief in our appellate cause number 04-16-00055-CV or as a petition for writ of mandamus. If Ms. Seal fails to respond by the deadline, the filing will be construed as the appellant’s brief in our appellate cause number 04-16-00055-CV.

Because appellant failed to request the reporter’s record in response to two prior orders, this court will only consider those issues raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). _________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of June, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of W.T.H., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

in the Interest of W.T.H., a Child (in the Interest of W.T.H., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.