In the Interest of W. S. v. State
This text of 393 So. 2d 642 (In the Interest of W. S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. We note, however, that the court rendered a verdict of not guilty of burglary and guilty of grand theft. The subsequent written commitment order and sentence erroneously recited that appellant was adjudicated guilty of burglary and grand theft. The lower tribunal is instructed to correct the record to reflect the conviction for grand theft only. Anderson v. State, 338 So.2d 209 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).
AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED TO CORRECT RECORD.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 So. 2d 642, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-w-s-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.