In the Interest of W. S. v. State
393 So. 2d 642, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18678
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 1981·No. No. 79-2434·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED. We note, however, that the court rendered a verdict of not guilty of burglary and guilty of grand theft. The subsequent written commitment order and sentence erroneously recited that appellant was adjudicated guilty of burglary and grand theft. The lower tribunal is instructed to correct the record to reflect the conviction for grand theft only. Anderson v. State, 338 So.2d 209 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).
AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED TO CORRECT RECORD.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of W. S. v. State, 393 So. 2d 642, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
393 So. 2d 642 (In the Interest of W. S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sloan v. Sloan
393 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)