Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/In the Interest of W. S. G.

In the Interest of W. S. G.

334 S.E.2d 739, 175 Ga. App. 883, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2211
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 10, 1985
Docket70689
StatusPublished

This text of 334 S.E.2d 739 (In the Interest of W. S. G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of W. S. G., 334 S.E.2d 739, 175 Ga. App. 883, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Houston County Juvenile Court granting temporary custody of W. S. G. to the Houston County Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS). The Houston DFCS filed a petition alleging that W. S. G. was without proper parental care and subsistence necessary for his physical, mental and emotional health, and thus was a deprived child and such deprivation was likely to continue. Although deprivation is both grounds for termination of parental rights under OCGA § 15-11-51 and loss of temporary custody of the minor child under OCGA § 15-11-34, the DFCS requested only temporary custody, and the juvenile court granted only temporary custody of W. S. G. to the DFCS. Though the parties have treated this as a termination, this is not a termination or severance of parental rights case, but only involves child custody. In re R. R. M. R., 169 Ga. App. 373 (1) (312 SE2d 832); Rodgers v. Dept. of Human Resources, 157 Ga. App. 235 (1) (276 SE2d 902); Painter v. Barkley, 157 Ga. App. 69, 70 (276 SE2d 850).

Accordingly, as this is appellate review of an issue involving child custody, review must be requested under the procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-35. There being no compliance with that section, this [884]*884appeal must be dismissed. In the Interest of J. E. P. III, 168 Ga. App. 30 (308 SE2d 712), aff'd. 252 Ga. 520 (315 SE2d 416).

Decided September 10, 1985. Terri S. Patterson, for appellant. Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, George F. Nunn, for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Carley and Sognier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodgers v. Department of Human Resources
276 S.E.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Painter v. Barkley
276 S.E.2d 651 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
In Re RRMR
312 S.E.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
In the Interest of J. E. P.
308 S.E.2d 712 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
In the Interest of J. E. P.
315 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1984)
In re R. R. M. R.
169 Ga. App. 373 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 S.E.2d 739, 175 Ga. App. 883, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-w-s-g-gactapp-1985.