In the Interest of W. L. F.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of W. L. F.

408 So. 2d 1089, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19004

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1982·No. No. 81-434·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief consistent with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have carefully reviewed the record and the brief filed on behalf of the appellant and find that there is substantial competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment. See, Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981). Accordingly, the judgment and conviction is affirmed and counsel for the appellant’s motion to withdraw is granted.

LETTS, C. J., and HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief consistent with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have carefully reviewed the record and the brief filed on behalf of the appellant and find that there is substantial competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment. See, Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981). Accordingly, the judgment and conviction is affirmed and counsel for the appellant’s motion to withdraw is granted.

LETTS, C. J., and HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

In the Interest of W. L. F., 408 So. 2d 1089, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19004 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

408 So. 2d 1089 (In the Interest of W. L. F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related