In the Interest of V.E.P.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of V.E.P.

507 So. 2d 804, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1392, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8475

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 1987

DocketNo. 87-0665

StatusPublished

This text of 507 So. 2d 804 (In the Interest of V.E.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of V.E.P., 507 So. 2d 804, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1392, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat this petition for writ of mandamus as a non-final appeal. We so advised the parties by previous order of court and directed appellee to file an answer brief within ten days from the date of that order. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services responded by stating, “[It] is submitted that DHRS has no opposition to visitation by the mother with VEP.”

Accordingly, the order¹ denying visitation to the mother is reversed. We remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to conduct a hearing to determine the terms and conditions of visitation so as to provide for the safety, well being and best interest of the child.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We treat this petition for writ of mandamus as a non-final appeal. We so advised the parties by previous order of court and directed appellee to file an answer brief within ten days from the date of that order. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services responded by stating, “[It] is submitted that DHRS has no opposition to visitation by the mother with VEP.”

Accordingly, the order¹ denying visitation to the mother is reversed. We remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to conduct a hearing to determine the terms and conditions of visitation so as to provide for the safety, well being and best interest of the child.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 So. 2d 804, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1392, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-vep-fladistctapp-1987.