In the Interest of V.C.F.

188 S.W.3d 461, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2006 WL 539463
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 7, 2006·No. ED 85866·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the judgment terminating of her parental rights to her minor daughter, V.C.F. In her two points on appeal, Mother contends the trial court erred in terminating her parental rights under Section 211.447, RSMo 2000, because there was no clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that any of the statutory grounds existed for termination.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of V.C.F., 188 S.W.3d 461, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2006 WL 539463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

188 S.W.3d 461 (In the Interest of V.C.F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vinson v. Adams
188 S.W.3d 461 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)