In the Interest of T.U., a Child v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Interest of T.U., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of T.U., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00057-CV ___________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF T.U., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 467th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-11831-462
Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant M.U. (Father) attempts to appeal from the trial court’s November 7,
2023 “Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Special Exceptions, and Order on Motion
for Enforcement” (collectively the Order). Because Father timely filed a request for
findings of fact and conclusions of law, his notice of appeal was due February 5,
2024—ninety days after the Order was signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(4). But
Father did not file his notice of appeal until February 7, 2024, making it untimely. See
id.
On February 13, 2024, we notified the parties by letter of our concern that we
lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was untimely. See id.
We warned that we could dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless Father or
any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response by February 23, 2024,
showing a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 10.5(b), 26.3(b), 42.3(a). We have received no response.
The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and without
a timely filed notice of appeal or a timely filed extension request, we must dismiss the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.1, 26.3; Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676,
677 (Tex. 1998); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because Father’s
notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); 2M Rsch. Servs., LLC v. Pragmatic Fin., LLC, No. 02-
22-00239-CV, 2022 WL 4105415, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 8, 2022, no
2 pet.) (mem. op.) (“Because Appellants did not timely file a notice of appeal, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”).
/s/ Dana Womack
Dana Womack Justice
Delivered: March 7, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of T.U., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-tu-a-child-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.