In the Interest of T.S.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of T.S.

504 So. 2d 61, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 842, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7329

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 1987

DocketNo. BQ-121

StatusPublished

This text of 504 So. 2d 61 (In the Interest of T.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of T.S., 504 So. 2d 61, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 842, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7329 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order entered pursuant to the mandate previously issued in In the Interest of T.S., 471 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). By way of a motion to relinquish jurisdiction, the appellee, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, asserted that the order giving rise to the present appeal is virtually, and substantively, identical to the previously reversed order. On consideration of the motion to relinquish jurisdiction, appellee was ordered to show cause why the motion should not be construed as a confession of error. In response, appellee concedes that the motion to relinquish jurisdiction should be construed as a confession of error.

Accordingly, the appealed order is reversed.

BOOTH, C.J., and MILLS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order entered pursuant to the mandate previously issued in In the Interest of T.S., 471 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). By way of a motion to relinquish jurisdiction, the appellee, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, asserted that the order giving rise to the present appeal is virtually, and substantively, identical to the previously reversed order. On consideration of the motion to relinquish jurisdiction, appellee was ordered to show cause why the motion should not be construed as a confession of error. In response, appellee concedes that the motion to relinquish jurisdiction should be construed as a confession of error.

Accordingly, the appealed order is reversed.

BOOTH, C.J., and MILLS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 So. 2d 61, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 842, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ts-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack