in the Interest of Travis James Dillon Warren, a Minor Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 26, 2006
Docket13-03-00449-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of Travis James Dillon Warren, a Minor Child (in the Interest of Travis James Dillon Warren, a Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of Travis James Dillon Warren, a Minor Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-03-449-CV

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF TRAVIS JAMES DILLON WARREN,

A MINOR CHILD,

                              On appeal from the 36th District Court

                                        of Aransas County, Texas.

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

                                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, James Warren and Lynn Warren, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-93-0285-CV-A.  No clerk=s record has been filed due to appellants= failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record. 


If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk=s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed.  Appellants responded to this Court=s notice; however, said response fails to establish that appellants are entitled to proceed without payment of costs.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,  is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 26th day of January, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of Travis James Dillon Warren, a Minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-travis-james-dillon-warren-a-minor-child-texapp-2006.