in the Interest of T.P., K.P. and T.P.
This text of in the Interest of T.P., K.P. and T.P. (in the Interest of T.P., K.P. and T.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00200-CV ____________________
IN THE INTEREST OF T.P., K.P. AND T.P. _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13-05-05380 CV ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 3, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed
for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the
appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. Appellant
did not respond to this Court’s notices.
Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown
that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.
There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk’s record, we
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3.
1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice
Submitted on September 3, 2014 Opinion Delivered September 4, 2014
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of T.P., K.P. and T.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-tp-kp-and-tp-texapp-2014.