In the Interest of T.N.

484 So. 2d 655, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6930
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1986·No. No. 85-1300·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order for dependency because the record reveals substantial competent evidence which supports such ruling. No abuse of discretion having been demonstrated, the order is

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., and CO-WART, EDWARD D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of T.N., 484 So. 2d 655, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6930 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

484 So. 2d 655 (In the Interest of T.N.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rose v. Rose (In Re Rose)
155 B.R. 394 (W.D. Louisiana, 1993)