In the Interest of T.K.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of T.K.

569 So. 2d 943, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815, 1990 WL 179114

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 21, 1990

DocketNo. 90-1369

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 569 So. 2d 943 (In the Interest of T.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of T.K., 569 So. 2d 943, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815, 1990 WL 179114 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state has filed a non-final appeal from a pre-trial order granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence in a delinquency proceeding. We treat the state’s notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the petition. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988) and State v. M.G., 550 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 551 So.2d 462 (Fla.1989).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state has filed a non-final appeal from a pre-trial order granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence in a delinquency proceeding. We treat the state’s notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the petition. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988) and State v. M.G., 550 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 551 So.2d 462 (Fla.1989).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

569 So. 2d 943, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815, 1990 WL 179114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-tk-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack