in the Interest of T.J., T.J., and C.M.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-20-00117-CV __________________
IN THE INTEREST OF T.J., T.J., AND C.M. __________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 418th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19-01-01566-CV __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 5, 2020, the trial court signed an order in this suit affecting the
parent-child relationship. Appellant filed a notice of appeal but failed to file a brief.
On November 9, 2020, we notified the parties that the appellant’s brief was past due
and warned that if the brief and a motion for extension of time were not filed, the
case would be submitted to the Court on the record alone. The Clerk also notified
the parties that submission without briefs could result in dismissal of the appeal for
want of prosecution. On November 30, 2020, we notified the parties that the appeal
would be submitted to the Court on the record alone on December 21, 2020.
1 The Clerk has provided notice to the appellant that the appeal could be
dismissed for want of prosecution for failure to comply with the Court’s direction.
Appellant has failed to comply with the Court’s instruction to prosecute the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.3.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on December 21, 2020 Opinion Delivered January 14, 2021
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of T.J., T.J., and C.M. (in the Interest of T.J., T.J., and C.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.