In the Interest of T.G.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of T.G.

570 So. 2d 1143, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9727, 1990 WL 198458

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 12, 1990

DocketNo. 90-0611

StatusPublished

This text of 570 So. 2d 1143 (In the Interest of T.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of T.G., 570 So. 2d 1143, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9727, 1990 WL 198458 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for battery and adjudication as a delinquent. The trial court imposed the sum of $250 as costs towards the public defender’s fee without giving appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of these costs on the authority of Beasley v. State, 565 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) and Hostzclaw v. State, 561 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

ANSTEAD, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for battery and adjudication as a delinquent. The trial court imposed the sum of $250 as costs towards the public defender’s fee without giving appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of these costs on the authority of Beasley v. State, 565 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) and Hostzclaw v. State, 561 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

ANSTEAD, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 So. 2d 1143, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9727, 1990 WL 198458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-tg-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack