in the Interest of T.G., A.G. and A.H., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 12, 2012·No. 12-12-00435-CV·Published

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 2010C-1527

IN THE INTEREST OF § EX THE DISTRICT COURT OF § TY GREGORY § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS ALEXIS GREGORY § ALYSON HARRISON §

CHILDREN S 3rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER REGARDING PATERNITY g AND go w f= ORDER OF TERMINATION ^c/J^ S

On July 20, 2012, the Court heard this case. 7X) m 1. Appearances I^W^ o o o

11. The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services ("the^DepaiWng appeared through Sandra Stames, caseworker, and by attorney, Shen Shepherd and announced ready.

1.2. Respondent Mother, Julie Harrison, appeared in person. Attorney of record, Nolan Wickel, appeared and announced ready.

13 Respondent Adjudicated Father of Ty Gregory, Todd Gregory, appeared in person. Attorney of record, Chris Tinsley, appeared and announced ready.

1 4. Respondent Alleged Father of Alexis Gregory, Billy D'Wayne Denison, did not appear. Attorney of record, Nolan Wickel, appeared and announced ready.

1.5. John Youngblood, appointed by the Court as attorney ad litem of the children the subject of this suit, appeared and announced ready.

1.6. CASA of Trinity Valley, appointed by the Court as guardian ad litem of the children the subject of this suit, appeared and announced ready.

2. Jurisdiction and Service of Process

2.1. The Court finds that a request for identification of a court of continuing, exclusive jurisdiction has been made as required by Texas Family Code §155.101.

2.2. The Court, having examined the record and heard the evidence and argument of counsel, finds that this Court has jurisdiction of this case and of all the parties and that no other court has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction of this case.

2.3. The Court, having examined the record and heard the evidence and argument of counsel, finds that the State of Texas has jurisdiction to render final orders

— ! ' 2010C-1527 Order of Termination 3™ Judicial District Court Pagej . regarding the children the subject of this suit pursuant to Subchapter C, Chapter 152, Tex. Fam. Code, by virtue of the fact that Texas is the home state of the children.

2.4. All persons entitled to citation were properly cited.

3. Jury

A jury was waived, and all questions of fact and of law were submitted to the Court.

4. Record

The record of testimony was duly reported by the court reporter for the 3"1 Judicial District Court.

5. The Children

The Court finds that the following children are the subject of this suit:

5.1. Name: Ty Gregory Sex: Male Birthplace: Unknown Birth Date: May 2,2006 Social Security Number: xxx-xx-5893 Present Residence: Foster home

5.2. Name: Alexis Gregory Sex: Female Birthplace: Unknown Birth Date: November 12, 2007 Social Security Number: xxx-xx-2632 Present Residence: Foster Home

53 Name: Alyson Harrison Sex: Female Birthplace: Unknown Birth Date: August 15, 2004 Social Security Number: xxx-xx-4648 Present Residence: Foster home

6. Paternity: ALYSON HARRISON

6.1. The Court finds that TODD GREGORY, is an alleged father of ALYSON HARRISON, a child a subject of this suit.

62 The Court finds that genetic testing was ordered in this case to determine whether TODD GREGORY is the biological father of ALYSON HARRISON.

2010C-1527 Orter of Termination 3« J(jd^ District c^ P 2 63 The Court finds that a report of genetic testing regarding the parentage of ALYSON HARRISON, a child a subject of this suit, was duly admitted into evidence pursuant to §160.504 of the Texas Family Code.

6 4. The Court finds that the report of such genetic testing shows that TODD GREGORY is NOT the biological father of ALYSON HARRISON.

6.5. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that TODD GREGORY is NOT the biological father of ALYSON HARRISON.

7. Paternity: ALEXIS GREGORY

7.1. The Court finds that TODD GREGORY, is an alleged father of ALEXIS GREGORY, a child a subject of this suit.

7.2. The Court finds that genetic testing was ordered in this case to determine whether TODD GREGORY is the biological father of ALEXIS GREGORY.

73 The Court finds that a report of genetic testing regarding the parentage of the ALEXIS GREGORY, a child a subject of this suit, was duly admitted into evidence pursuant to §160.504 of the Texas Family Code.

74 The Court finds that the report of such genetic testing shows that TODD GREGORY is NOT the biological father of ALEXIS GREGORY.

7.5. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that TODD GREGORY is NOT the biological father of ALEXIS GREGORY.

8. Termination of Respondent Mother, JULIE HARRISON'S, Parental Rights

81 The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the parent- child relationship between JULIE HARRISON and the children the subject of this suit is in the children's best interest.

82 The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that JULD2 HARRISON has:

8.2.1. engaged in conduct or knowingly placed the children with persons who engaged in conduct which endangers the physical or emotional well-being of the children;

8.2.2. constructively abandoned the children who have been in the permanent or temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services or an authorized agency for not less than six months, and: (1) the Department or authorized agency has made reasonable efforts to return the children to the mother; (2) the mother has not regularly visited or maintained significant contact with the children; and (3)the

. ■ ■ ' 2010C-1527 Order of Termination 3« Judicial District Court Pj

&L2L-LL3-£B£--wo->J SB =11 mother has demonstrated an inability to provide the children with a safe environment;

8.2.3. failed to comply with the provisions of a court order that specifically established the actions necessary for the mother to obtain the return of the children who have been in the permanent or temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services for not less than nine months as a result of the children's removal from the parent under Chapter 262 for the abuse or neglect of the children;

83 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parent-child relationship between JULIE HARRISON and the children, ALYSON HARRISON, ALEXIS GREGORY, and TY GREGORY, the subject of this suit is terminated.

9. Termination of Respondent Father, TODD GREGORY'S, Parental Rights

9 1 The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the parent- child relationship between TODD GREGORY and the child, TY GREGORY, is in the child's best interest.

9.2. The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that TODD GREGORY has:

9.2.1. engaged in conduct or knowingly placed the child with persons who engaged in conduct which endangers the physical or emotional well-being of the child;

9.2.2. failed to comply with the provisions of a court order that specifically established the actions necessary for the father to obtain the return of the child who has been in the permanent or temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services for not less than nine months as a result of the child's removal from the parent under Chapter 262 for the abuse or neglect of the child;

93 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parent-child relationship between TODD GREGORY and the child, TY GREGORY, is terminated.

10. Termination of AUeged Father, BELLY D'WAYNE DENISON's, Parental Rights

10.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of T.G., A.G. and A.H., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in the Interest of T.G., A.G. and A.H., Children (in the Interest of T.G., A.G. and A.H., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 155.101
Texas FA § 155.101