In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State

725 So. 2d 466, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369, 1999 WL 77751

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 1999·No. No. 98-2540·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for the entry of separate commitment orders, one for each offense, see A.F. v. State, 718 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and direct that the commitment order for the offense of battery must not exceed one year, see M.J.P. v. State, — So.2d -, 22 Fla.L. Weekly D2090, 1997 WL 536011 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.3, 1997), approved 717 So.2d 459 (Fla.1998); C.P. v. State, 674 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); T.G. v. State, 677 So.2d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for the entry of separate commitment orders, one for each offense, see A.F. v. State, 718 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and direct that the commitment order for the offense of battery must not exceed one year, see M.J.P. v. State, — So.2d -, 22 Fla.L. Weekly D2090, 1997 WL 536011 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.3, 1997), approved 717 So.2d 459 (Fla.1998); C.P. v. State, 674 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); T.G. v. State, 677 So.2d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State, 725 So. 2d 466, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369, 1999 WL 77751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

725 So. 2d 466 (In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related