in the Interest of T.D., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 30, 2013
Docket04-13-00617-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of T.D., Children (in the Interest of T.D., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of T.D., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00617-CV

In the Interest of T.D. and R.B., Children

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PA-00167 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 30, 2013

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

This is an appeal from a final order terminating the parent-child relationship. An appeal

from a final order terminating the parent-child relationship is accelerated. See TEX. FAM. CODE

ANN. § 109.002(a) (West Supp. 2012); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a). In an accelerated appeal, the notice

of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the judgment or order is signed. In the Interest of

K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 927 (Tex. 2005); TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). A timely notice of appeal is

necessary to invoke this court’s appellate jurisdiction. See K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d at 927-28; TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.1(b),(c).

Here, the trial court signed an order terminating appellant R.B.’s parental rights on June

26, 2013. Thus, R.B.’s notice of appeal was due on July 16, 2013. However, R.B did not file his

notice of appeal until September 11, 2013. Because R.B.’s notice of appeal was untimely, we 04-13-00617-CV

ordered R.B. to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. R.B.

filed a response to our order, but the response fails to demonstrate this court’s jurisdiction over

this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of K.A.F.
160 S.W.3d 923 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of T.D., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-td-children-texapp-2013.