in the Interest of T.C., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 31, 2009
Docket04-09-00126-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of T.C., Children (in the Interest of T.C., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of T.C., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion





OPINION



No. 04-09-00126-CV


IN THE INTEREST OF T.C. and J.C.


From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2007-PA-01834
Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding


Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice



Delivered and Filed: August 31, 2009



RECORD ORDERED

This is an appeal from the trial court's order terminating appellant's parental rights. After the trial court signed the termination order, appellant filed a Motion for New Trial and Statement of Appellate Points, in which appellant challenged the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence in support of the findings on which the termination order was based. Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion for new trial, sustained appellant's affidavit of indigence, and ruled that the appeal was frivolous. On appeal to this court, appellant again challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, as well as asserting he did not receive effective assistance of counsel.



We review a trial court's determination that an appeal is frivolous under an abuse of discretion standard. In re M.R.J.M., 193 S.W.3d 670, 673 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2006, no pet.) (en banc). After reviewing the record from the new trial hearing, we are unable to determine whether the trial court acted within its discretion from that record alone. Therefore, we conclude a review of the reporter's record from the termination proceeding is necessary to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion. See In re D.M., No. 04-08-00264-CV, 2008 WL 4500310, at *2 n.2 (Tex. App.--San Antonio Oct. 8, 2008, no pet.); In re M.R.J.M., 193 S.W.3d at 675-76; In re S.T., 242 S.W.3d 923, 925 (Tex. App.--Waco 2008, no pet.); M.C. v. Tex. Dep't of Family & Prot. Servs., No. 08-08-00053-CV, 2008 WL 5175879, at *1 (Tex. App.-- El Paso Dec. 11, 2008, no pet.). But see In re R.C.R., No. 14-08-00904-CV, 2009 WL 997514, at *3 n.4 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, no pet.); In re A.S., 239 S.W.3d 390, 391-93 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2007, no pet.).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the court reporters shall, on or before thirty (30) days from the date of this opinion and order, and without cost to the appellant, prepare and file reporter's records containing all of the evidence admitted at the termination trial. (1)



Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(d). This order does not require the court reporters to prepare reporter's records of any nonevidentiary portions of the trial, such as pretrial hearings, voir dire, closing arguments, and postjudgment proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M.C. v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services
300 S.W.3d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
in the Interest of A.S.
239 S.W.3d 390 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
in the Interest of S.T., a Child
242 S.W.3d 923 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of T.C., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-tc-children-texapp-2009.