in the Interest of T. W., C. W., Jr., W. W., S. W. and D. W., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of T. W., C. W., Jr., W. W., S. W. and D. W., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 9, 2015·No. 12-15-00126-CV·Published

Opinion

NO. 12-15-00126-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF T. W., § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND

C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W., § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

CHILDREN § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On May 8, 2015, D.G.M. filed a pro se “Notice of Partial Appeal” complaining of the trial court’s order striking the intervenor (D.G.M.) and his pleadings without prejudice. On May 20, 2015, this court notified D.G.M., pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.2 and 42.3, that the information received in this appeal does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order. See Metromedia Long Distance, Inc. v. Hughes, 810 S.W.2d 494, 499 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1991, writ denied) (recognizing order dismissing or striking petition in intervention may not be appealed by intervenor before entry of final judgment). D.G.M. was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or before June 19, 2015, to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline for amendment has passed, and D.G.M. has not shown the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, as to D.G.M. only, for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2, 42.3. Opinion delivered July 8, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 8, 2015

NO. 12-15-00126-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T. W., C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W., CHILDREN

Appeal from the 392nd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. FAM 15-0010-392)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal as to D.G.M. only, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction as to D.G.M. only; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-15-00126-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF T. W., § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND

C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W., § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

CHILDREN § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On May 8, 2015, D.G.M. filed a pro se “Notice of Partial Appeal” complaining of the trial court’s order striking the intervenor (D.G.M.) and his pleadings without prejudice. On May 20, 2015, this court notified D.G.M., pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.2 and 42.3, that the information received in this appeal does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order. See Metromedia Long Distance, Inc. v. Hughes, 810 S.W.2d 494, 499 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1991, writ denied) (recognizing order dismissing or striking petition in intervention may not be appealed by intervenor before entry of final judgment). D.G.M. was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or before June 19, 2015, to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline for amendment has passed, and D.G.M. has not shown the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, as to D.G.M. only, for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2, 42.3. Opinion delivered July 8, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 8, 2015

NO. 12-15-00126-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T. W., C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W., CHILDREN

Appeal from the 392nd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. FAM 15-0010-392)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal as to D.G.M. only, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction as to D.G.M. only; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

in the Interest of T. W., C. W., Jr., W. W., S. W. and D. W., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

in the Interest of T. W., C. W., Jr., W. W., S. W. and D. W., Children (in the Interest of T. W., C. W., Jr., W. W., S. W. and D. W., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related