in the Interest of T. J. D. W., Minor Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of T. J. D. W., Minor Child

DecidedApril 18, 2002

Docket13-02-00012-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of T. J. D. W., Minor Child (in the Interest of T. J. D. W., Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of T. J. D. W., Minor Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-02-012-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF T.J.D.W., A MINOR CHILD

________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas

________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, James Warren and Lynn Warren, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-93-0285-CV-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on May 7, 2001. A timely motion for new trial was filed on May 9, 2001. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), appellants= notice of appeal was due on August 5, 2001, but was not filed until August 31, 2001.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. On February 8, 2002, appellants= untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal was received in this Court.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants= failure to timely perfect their appeal, and appellants= untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants= untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 18^th day of April, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-02-012-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF T.J.D.W., A MINOR CHILD

________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas

________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, James Warren and Lynn Warren, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-93-0285-CV-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on May 7, 2001. A timely motion for new trial was filed on May 9, 2001. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), appellants= notice of appeal was due on August 5, 2001, but was not filed until August 31, 2001.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. On February 8, 2002, appellants= untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal was received in this Court.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants= failure to timely perfect their appeal, and appellants= untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants= untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 18^th day of April, 2002.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of T. J. D. W., Minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-t-j-d-w-minor-child-texapp-2002.