in the Interest of S.W.B.-L.et Al

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 12, 2015
Docket04-15-00146-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of S.W.B.-L.et Al (in the Interest of S.W.B.-L.et Al) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of S.W.B.-L.et Al, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00146-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.W.B.-L.ET AL,

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-PA-02179 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER In this accelerated appeal of the February 23, 2015 order terminating Appellant’s parental rights, on May 22, 2015, this court granted Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief until June 8, 2015. We warned Appellant we would not grant any further extensions absent extenuating circumstances. On June 8, 2015, Appellant’s counsel notified this court of a death in his family and moved this court for an extension of time to file the brief until June 16, 2015, a due date ninety- eight days after the notice of appeal was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a); see also TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2, available at http://www.txcourts.gov/media/698396/rja_20140901.pdf (directing courts of appeals to dispose of SAPCR suits “[w]ithin 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed”). Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief must be filed with this court not later than June 16, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. If Appellant fails to file the brief as ordered, we will abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See, e.g., TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b); see also TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013 (West 2014) (requiring the trial court to appoint counsel to represent an indigent parent in a parental termination case); In re K.S.M., 61 S.W.3d 632, 633 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2001, no pet.) (“Like indigent criminal appellants, indigent appellants challenging an order terminating their parental rights enjoy a right to counsel on appeal.”); cf. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State, 952 S.W.2d 50, 52–53 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.). _________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of K.S.M., a Child
61 S.W.3d 632 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Samaniego v. State
952 S.W.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of S.W.B.-L.et Al, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-swb-let-al-texapp-2015.