in the Interest of S.W.
This text of in the Interest of S.W. (in the Interest of S.W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-21-00145-CV __________________
IN THE INTEREST OF S.W. __________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 279th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F-238,664 _________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Mother and Father appeal from an order terminating their parental rights to
their minor child, S.W. 1 The trial court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that
statutory grounds exist for termination of Mother’s and Father’s parental rights and
that termination of their parental rights would be in the best interest of S.W. See Tex.
Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(b)(1) (I), (2).
Mother’s and Father’s appointed appellate counsel submitted separate briefs
in which counsel contends that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on
1 We refer to the appellants as “Mother” and “Father” and their child by her initials to protect their identities. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(2). 1 appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In the Interest of L.D.T., 161
S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The briefs provide
counsels’ professional evaluation of the record. Counsel served Mother and Father
with a copy of the Anders brief filed on their behalf. This Court notified Mother and
Father of their right to file a pro se response, as well as the deadline for doing so.
This Court did not receive a pro se response from either parent.
We have independently reviewed the appellate record and counsels’ briefs,
and we agree that any appeal would be frivolous. We find no arguable error requiring
us to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief this appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State,
813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s order
terminating Mother’s and Father’s parental rights.
AFFIRMED.
_________________________ W. SCOTT GOLEMON Chief Justice
Submitted on September 8, 2021 Opinion Delivered September 23, 2021
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of S.W., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-sw-texapp-2021.