In the Interest of S.O., a Child v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Interest of S.O., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of S.O., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00065-CV ___________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF S.O., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360-701090-21
Before Kerr, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant M.O. (Father) filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s
February 7, 2023 “Order Terminating Parental Rights” in the termination-and-
adoption suit filed by Father’s child’s mother and her spouse. The trial court
subsequently granted Father’s motion to vacate the termination order on April 26,
2023, while it still had plenary power over the case. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(e).
On May 3, 2023, we informed Father that it appeared that the trial court’s
granting of his motion to vacate rendered this appeal moot and that the appeal would
be dismissed as moot unless, on or before May 10, 2023, he filed a response stating
grounds for continuing the appeal. We have received no response. Accordingly, on
our own motion, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
Even if this appeal is not moot, Father has failed to prosecute it. In our May 3,
2023 letter, we also notified Father that his brief had not been filed as the appellate
rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal
for want of prosecution unless, on or before May 10, 2023, Father filed with the court
an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s
untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because Father has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity
to explain the initial failure, we alternatively dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
2 /s/ Elizabeth Kerr Elizabeth Kerr Justice
Delivered: May 25, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of S.O., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-so-a-child-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.