In the Interest of S.M.I.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of S.M.I.

295 S.W.3d 234, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1458, 2009 WL 3364387

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 2009·No. ED 92397·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Q.I. (Mother), appeals from the judgment of the family court of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor child, S.M.I. (Child), born October 11, 2006, pursuant to Section 211.447, RSMo 2000. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No *235 error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Q.I. (Mother), appeals from the judgment of the family court of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor child, S.M.I. (Child), born October 11, 2006, pursuant to Section 211.447, RSMo 2000. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No *235 error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of S.M.I., 295 S.W.3d 234, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1458, 2009 WL 3364387 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

295 S.W.3d 234 (In the Interest of S.M.I.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related