in the Interest of S.M.G. and H.D.W., Children
Opinion
NO. 07-11-00340-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
MARCH 13, 2012
IN THE INTEREST OF S.M.G. AND H.D.W., CHILDREN
FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 59,060-C; HONORABLE JAMES ANDERSON, JUDGE
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this appeal from an order terminating the parent-child relationship existing
between appellant J.W. and his daughters S.M.G. and H.D.W., appellant asserts the
trial court reversibly erred by failing to appoint counsel to represent him at the
termination hearing.
Appellee the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services sought relief
including termination of appellant’s parental rights in a petition filed in February 2010.
The case reached final hearing in July 2011.
In response to appellant’s brief raising a single issue, the Department has filed a
motion which, after notice, we have treated as its appellee’s brief. In it, the Department
notes our opinion in In re J.M., No. 07-11-0339-CV, 2012 Tex. App. Lexis 904 (Tex.App.--Amarillo Feb. 1, 2012, n.p.h.), and based on our holding in that case
concedes the trial court reversibly erred. After review of the record, we agree the
circumstances presented are sufficiently similar to those in In re J.M. to require reversal
here as well. Accordingly, we sustain appellant’s issue, reverse the trial court’s
judgment and remand the case.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of S.M.G. and H.D.W., Children (in the Interest of S.M.G. and H.D.W., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.