in the Interest of S.M.G. and H.D.W., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 13, 2012·No. 07-11-00340-CV·Published

Opinion

NO. 07-11-00340-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

MARCH 13, 2012

IN THE INTEREST OF S.M.G. AND H.D.W., CHILDREN

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 59,060-C; HONORABLE JAMES ANDERSON, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this appeal from an order terminating the parent-child relationship existing

between appellant J.W. and his daughters S.M.G. and H.D.W., appellant asserts the

trial court reversibly erred by failing to appoint counsel to represent him at the

termination hearing.

Appellee the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services sought relief

including termination of appellant’s parental rights in a petition filed in February 2010.

The case reached final hearing in July 2011.

In response to appellant’s brief raising a single issue, the Department has filed a

motion which, after notice, we have treated as its appellee’s brief. In it, the Department

notes our opinion in In re J.M., No. 07-11-0339-CV, 2012 Tex. App. Lexis 904 (Tex.App.--Amarillo Feb. 1, 2012, n.p.h.), and based on our holding in that case

concedes the trial court reversibly erred. After review of the record, we agree the

circumstances presented are sufficiently similar to those in In re J.M. to require reversal

here as well. Accordingly, we sustain appellant’s issue, reverse the trial court’s

judgment and remand the case.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of S.M.G. and H.D.W., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in the Interest of S.M.G. and H.D.W., Children (in the Interest of S.M.G. and H.D.W., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.