in the Interest of S.E.M., a Child
This text of in the Interest of S.E.M., a Child (in the Interest of S.E.M., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 24, 2018
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00414-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF S.E.M., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-05078
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it appeared the notice of appeal
was untimely. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the jurisdictional issue.
Appellant filed a letter brief but wholly failed to address the timeliness issue.
The trial court signed the judgment on December 13, 2017. Appellant filed a motion to set
aside default judgment and for new trial on February 12, 2018. Because this motion was filed
more than 30 days after the judgment, it was untimely and did not extend the time to file a notice
of appeal. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a) (motion for new trial must be filed within 30 days after the
judgment is signed).
Without a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate timetable, a notice of
appeal is due within 30 days after the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Accordingly,
the notice of appeal was due on January 12, 2018. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 9,
2018. We note that in his notice of appeal, appellant states he is appealing the trial court’s “judgment entered by the court on March 8, 2018.” The trial court signed the order denying
appellant’s untimely motion for new trial on that date. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal,
however, runs from the date of judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. As mentioned above, appellant
filed a letter brief but wholly failed to address the timeliness of the notice of appeal.
Because appellant failed to timely file a notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
180414F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF S.E.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-18-00414-CV Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-05078. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee Judith McDuffie recover her costs of this appeal from appellant Robert McDuffie.
Judgment entered July 24, 2018_.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of S.E.M., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-sem-a-child-texapp-2018.