in the Interest of S.D., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of S.D., a Child

DecidedJuly 30, 2003

Docket04-03-00316-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of S.D., a Child (in the Interest of S.D., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of S.D., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-03-00316-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S. D., A Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001-PA-01778

Honorable Juan Gallardo, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Paul W. Green, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 30, 2003

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant's brief in this accelerated appeal was due to be filed by June 17, 2003. No brief or motion for extension of time was filed. On June 24, 2003, we ordered appellant to show cause no later than July 9, 2003, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Appellant was warned that failure to respond would result in dismissal of the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b, c). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-03-00316-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S. D., A Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001-PA-01778

Honorable Juan Gallardo, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Paul W. Green, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 30, 2003

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant's brief in this accelerated appeal was due to be filed by June 17, 2003. No brief or motion for extension of time was filed. On June 24, 2003, we ordered appellant to show cause no later than July 9, 2003, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Appellant was warned that failure to respond would result in dismissal of the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b, c). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of S.D., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-sd-a-child-texapp-2003.