In the Interest of S.B., Minor Child
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 19-0044 Filed August 7, 2019
IN THE INTEREST OF S.B., Minor Child,
S.B., Minor Child, Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Boone County, Stephen A. Owen,
District Associate Judge.
S.B. appeals the juvenile court’s determination he should be required to
register with the sex offender registry. AFFIRMED.
Ashley M. Sparks of Cooper, Goedicke, Reimer & Reese, P.C., West Des
Moines, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee State.
Considered by Tabor, P.J., and Mullins and May, JJ. 2
MAY, Judge.
S.B. appeals the juvenile court’s determination that he must register with
the Iowa Sex Offender Registry.
In 2017, the juvenile court adjudicated S.B. as a delinquent for acts that
would constitute sexual abuse in the second degree, a class “B” felony, if
committed by an adult. In 2018, the juvenile court held a hearing to determine if it
should waive S.B.’s registration on the Iowa Sex Offender Registry. See Iowa
Code § 692A.103(3) (2015) (“A juvenile adjudicated delinquent for an offense that
requires registration shall be required to register as required in this chapter unless
the juvenile court waives the requirement and finds that the person should not be
required to register under this chapter.”). Following the hearing, the court ordered
S.B. to register. S.B. appeals. He argues the juvenile court erred in failing to
consider mitigating factors weighing against imposition of the registration
requirement.
When an appellant challenges the juvenile court’s exercise of statutory
discretion, “we review the evidence de novo to determine whether the discretion
was abused.” See In re A.J.M., 847 N.W.2d 601, 604 (Iowa 2014). Upon our
review of the record, we conclude the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in
ordering S.B. to register. Registration can be waived only when the juvenile court
finds the juvenile is “not likely to reoffend.” Id. at 606. The record does not
establish S.B. is unlikely to reoffend.
We agree with the ruling of the juvenile court, and we affirm without further
opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(d), (e).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of S.B., Minor Child (In the Interest of S.B., Minor Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.