in the Interest of S. M. L. D., a Child
This text of in the Interest of S. M. L. D., a Child (in the Interest of S. M. L. D., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Appellant Dwayne Lynn Dale filed a Motion to Dismiss on February 26, 2004.
No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. All costs are assessed to appellant.
James T. Campbell
Justice
be responsible for their own appellate costs, costs of this appeal shall be borne by the party that incurred them. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 6.6. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Mackey K. Hancock
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of S. M. L. D., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-s-m-l-d-a-child-texapp-2004.