In the Interest of S. J. Y.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of S. J. Y.

273 So. 2d 430

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 14, 1973

DocketNo. 72-617

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 So. 2d 430 (In the Interest of S. J. Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of S. J. Y., 273 So. 2d 430 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The minor appellant was adjudged “to be a traffic offender” and assigned punishment by the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court in and for Dade County, Florida. During the pendency in this court of an appeal from the judgment, this court granted appellant’s motion for a temporary release of jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of supplementing the record. Thereafter, the trial judge entered an order as follows: “That it now appears that said child was in fact convicted and assessed a fine in another jurisdiction for the same offense for which she was brought before the court.”

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence herein appealed are reversed and set aside. See Bizzell v. State, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 735.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The minor appellant was adjudged “to be a traffic offender” and assigned punishment by the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court in and for Dade County, Florida. During the pendency in this court of an appeal from the judgment, this court granted appellant’s motion for a temporary release of jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of supplementing the record. Thereafter, the trial judge entered an order as follows: “That it now appears that said child was in fact convicted and assessed a fine in another jurisdiction for the same offense for which she was brought before the court.”

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence herein appealed are reversed and set aside. See Bizzell v. State, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 735.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 So. 2d 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-s-j-y-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack