In the Interest of S. J. J.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of S. J. J.

351 So. 2d 1102, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16727

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 1977·No. No. 76-1756·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a probation violation hearing, the trial court entered an order on August 3, 1976, finding the minor to be in violation of probation but continued the minor on probation. We find the evidence insufficient to support that portion of the order finding a violation of probation. See Demchak v. State, 351 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Robbins v. State, 318 So.2d 472 (Fla. 4th [1103]*1103DCA 1975); Brown v. State, 305 So.2d 309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). However, we find the order proper in all other respects. Accordingly, the order is hereby modified to ex-elude the finding of a violation of probation; and the order is affirmed as modified.

ANSTEAD, DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a probation violation hearing, the trial court entered an order on August 3, 1976, finding the minor to be in violation of probation but continued the minor on probation. We find the evidence insufficient to support that portion of the order finding a violation of probation. See Demchak v. State, 351 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Robbins v. State, 318 So.2d 472 (Fla. 4th [1103]*1103DCA 1975); Brown v. State, 305 So.2d 309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). However, we find the order proper in all other respects. Accordingly, the order is hereby modified to ex-elude the finding of a violation of probation; and the order is affirmed as modified.

ANSTEAD, DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.

In the Interest of S. J. J., 351 So. 2d 1102, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16727 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

351 So. 2d 1102 (In the Interest of S. J. J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related