in the Interest of S. F. H.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2019
Docket03-18-00534-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of S. F. H. (in the Interest of S. F. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of S. F. H., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00534-CV

In the Interest of S. F. H.

FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-AG-18-000834, HONORABLE MARY ANN MORTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 10,

2018. On September 11, 2018, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to

his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit

a status report regarding this appeal by September 21, 2018. Further, the notice advised

appellant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal

for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to

this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed

without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established

that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: February 13, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of S. F. H., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-s-f-h-texapp-2019.