In the Interest of R.W. and A.P.-P., Children v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 9, 2024
Docket05-24-01018-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In the Interest of R.W. and A.P.-P., Children v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of R.W. and A.P.-P., Children v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of R.W. and A.P.-P., Children v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 9, 2024

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-01018-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.W. AND A.P.-P., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1-24-1007

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Kennedy Mother of R.W. and A.P.-P. and Father of R.W. appeal the trial court’s

temporary orders naming the Department of Family and Protective Services as

temporary managing conservator of the children. Because temporary orders in suits

affecting the parent-child relationship are not subject to interlocutory appeal, see

TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 105.001(e), we directed the parties to file, no later than

September 30, 2024, letter briefs explaining how we have jurisdiction over this

appeal. We cautioned the parties that failure to file the requested letter briefs by the

deadline could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). To date, the parties have not complied.1 Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 105.001(e); TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.3 (a), (c).

/Nancy Kennedy/ NANCY KENNEDY 241018F.P05 JUSTICE

1 Mother filed a pro se letter brief. In our September 9, 2024 order, we informed Mother that, because she is represented by counsel, we would only address filings filed by her counsel. See Scheanette v. State, 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n. 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (party is not entitled to hybrid representation). Accordingly, we do not address Mother’s pro se letter brief. –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF R.W. AND On Appeal from the County Court at A.P.-P., CHILDREN Law No. 1, Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1-24-1007. No. 05-24-01018-CV Opinion delivered by Justice Kennedy. Justices Molberg and Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered October 9, 2024

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scheanette v. State
144 S.W.3d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Interest of R.W. and A.P.-P., Children v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-rw-and-ap-p-children-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.