in the Interest of R.S., a Child
This text of in the Interest of R.S., a Child (in the Interest of R.S., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 20, 2009
AFFIRMED
After the trial court terminated her parental rights, Hiwaunis S. appealed the trial court's order determining that an appeal of the termination order would be frivolous. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(g) (Vernon 2002). Hiwaunis's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.--San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights) (mem. op.); see also In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2003, order) (same).
Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to Hiwaunis who was advised of her right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of R.S., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-rs-a-child-texapp-2009.