in the Interest of R.R.R., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 25, 2009
Docket04-08-00539-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of R.R.R., Children (in the Interest of R.R.R., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of R.R.R., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00539-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.R.R., et al.

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-PA-00866 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 25, 2009

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment terminating appellant’s parental rights. The

trial court found the points on which appellant intends to appeal to be frivolous. On November 6,

2008, this court ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court that either (1) the reporter’s

fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is

entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. Our order informed appellant that if he failed

to respond within the time provided, the court would consider only those issues raised in appellant’s

brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX . R. APP . P. 37.3(c). Appellant

did not respond to our order. On December 4, 2008, we ordered appellant to file a brief on the issue 04-08-00539-CV

of whether the appeal is frivolous. Neither a brief nor a motion to extend time was filed. Appellant

is represented on appeal by retained attorney Orlando Kell. Because Mr. Kell did not respond to any

of this court’s orders, on January 15, 2009, this court ordered Mr. Kell to show cause in writing why

this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.3(b). Our order

informed Mr. Kell that if he did not respond by January 26, 2009, this appeal would be dismissed

for want of prosecution. Id. No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for

want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against

appellant.

-2- 04-08-00539-CV

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of R.R.R., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-rrr-children-texapp-2009.