In the Interest of R.P.J.G v. L.J.G.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of R.P.J.G v. L.J.G.

240 S.W.3d 197, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1672

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 11, 2007·No. No. WD 68358·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the termination of her parental rights with regard to Child. After a thorough review of the record, this court concludes that the trial court’s findings are supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, that the termination was in the best interests of Child, and that the rendering court had jurisdiction to enter judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining the reasoning behind this decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the termination of her parental rights with regard to Child. After a thorough review of the record, this court concludes that the trial court’s findings are supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, that the termination was in the best interests of Child, and that the rendering court had jurisdiction to enter judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining the reasoning behind this decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of R.P.J.G v. L.J.G., 240 S.W.3d 197, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1672 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

240 S.W.3d 197 (In the Interest of R.P.J.G v. L.J.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related