in the Interest of Roland James Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez, Children
This text of in the Interest of Roland James Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez, Children (in the Interest of Roland James Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez, Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 28, 1999
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On October 8, 1998, following an order by this court noting that the clerk's record had not been filed, appellant, Roland H. Sanchez, notified this court that arrangements had been made to pay the fee for preparing the clerk's record. When appellant had still not paid the fee by June 8, 1999, this court ordered appellant to provide written proof that either the clerk's fee has been paid or that appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk's fee. Our June 8, 1999, order further stated that this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if appellant did not respond within ten days. Appellant did not respond. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant. PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of Roland James Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez, Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-roland-james-sanchez-daniel-san-texapp-1999.