In the Interest of Rly, Mry & Ray
This text of 349 S.E.2d 800 (In the Interest of Rly, Mry & Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Theodore Yadkowski, filed both a direct appeal and this discretionary appeal, seeking review of the termination of his parental rights to his three children. Appeals from termination of parental rights do not fall within the purview of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), which requires discretionary appeal procedures for child custody cases. The instant case thus being directly appealable, this discretionary appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
349 S.E.2d 800, 180 Ga. App. 559, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 2213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-rly-mry-ray-gactapp-1986.