In the Interest of Rly, Mry & Ray
349 S.E.2d 800, 180 Ga. App. 559, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 2213
Opinion
The appellant, Theodore Yadkowski, filed both a direct appeal and this discretionary appeal, seeking review of the termination of his parental rights to his three children. Appeals from termination of parental rights do not fall within the purview of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), which requires discretionary appeal procedures for child custody cases. The instant case thus being directly appealable, this discretionary appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of Rly, Mry & Ray, 349 S.E.2d 800, 180 Ga. App. 559, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 2213 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).
349 S.E.2d 800 (In the Interest of Rly, Mry & Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Interest Of: A. v. a Child (Father)
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
In the Interest Of: N. L., a Child (Mother)
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
In the Interest of D. S. P.
504 S.E.2d 211 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
In the Interest of J. P.
480 S.E.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)
In the Interest of L. W.
453 S.E.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
In the Interest of R. E. M.
427 S.E.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
In re S. N. S.
357 S.E.2d 127 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
In Re SNS
357 S.E.2d 127 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
In re R. L. Y.
351 S.E.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
In Re RLY
351 S.E.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)