In the Interest of R.L.C.

364 S.W.3d 271, 2012 WL 1339924, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 517
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 2012·No. No. ED 97326·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tammy Loughridge (Mother) appeals the judgments of the Circuit Court of Franklin County terminating her parental rights to her children, R.L.C., Jr. and J.C.L. (the “Children”). Mother contends that the court erred in terminating her parental rights because: (1) the evidence [272] supporting termination was not clear, cogent, and convincing; and (2) it was not in the best interests of the Children.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment terminating Mother’s parental rights is supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of R.L.C., 364 S.W.3d 271, 2012 WL 1339924, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 517 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

364 S.W.3d 271 (In the Interest of R.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.