In the Interest of R.H.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In the Interest of R.H.

758 A.2d 166

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In the Interest of R.H.. Read the opinion of the Court — 568 Pa. 1 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 11, 2000·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED to consider the following issues:

1) Whether a juvenile’s confession should be suppressed where a school police officer, authorized to exercise the same powers while on school property as the municipal police, interrogates the juvenile without advising the juvenile of his Miranda rights?

2) Whether a juvenile’s confession should be suppressed where a school police officer, authorized to exercise the same powers while on school property as the municipal police, interrogates the juvenile without informing him that he has a right to confer with counsel, or with an interested and informed parent or adult?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED to consider the following issues:

1) Whether a juvenile’s confession should be suppressed where a school police officer, authorized to exercise the same powers while on school property as the municipal police, interrogates the juvenile without advising the juvenile of his Miranda rights?

2) Whether a juvenile’s confession should be suppressed where a school police officer, authorized to exercise the same powers while on school property as the municipal police, interrogates the juvenile without informing him that he has a right to confer with counsel, or with an interested and informed parent or adult?

In the Interest of R.H., 758 A.2d 166 (Pa. 2000).

Pincite

758 A.2d 166 (In the Interest of R.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.